FOUNT, AirSpace Gallery
Elena Gileva & Mark Malarko
22nd September - 4th November.
Over periods of time, fountains have garnered numerous connotations – from sources of clean water and symbols of municipal status to sites of leisure and social interaction. In partnership with the British Ceramics Biennial (BCB), AirSpace Gallery has commissioned two artists to respond to the concept of public fountains – notably due to the fact that Stoke-on-Trent was once a major ceramic fountain manufacturer, and also because 10 minutes walk from the gallery is a well-known spot called Fountain Square. Ironically there's no fountain, merely a melancholic circular entourage of paving stones outlining the space where various incarnations have formerly stood.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c0e4/7c0e4870b085c01c1b3e0c5865e47a559ff1c1fb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f646/3f646c31bfbb1813cf4ad0315185425ee6de64c9" alt=""
Elsewhere, grey ceramic plumbing litters the space and leads the viewer's eye from ceiling to floor. As well as adding depth and height to the low-lying slip, these pipes, with their industrial aesthetic, are suggestive of the infrastructure and administrative components that regulate a city and public space. However, instead of being cold and metallic, these pipes are imperfect – curved and chunky, they challenge the regimented appearance of functional piping: they critique the conventions of both their real-life counterpart and traditional ceramic processes with irregularity.
At the head of the installation is a large-scale 'horn of
plenty', which is divided into three segments. Its gilded interior exudes richness and abundance, and yet the clay slip within it appears sparse and drained: it is left to the viewer to activate the work as the symbolic water begins to dry up. Members of the public are invited to make the precarious journey across the ceramic stepping-stones, suggesting alternative pathways and junctures for communities. While the liberating motion of water is not quite achieved, the work's imperfect nature questions what value public fountains – which are, for the most part, manmade structures – bring to city inhabitants.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a172e/a172e7719b27fae3bf15af5363eb76cd6b06fc5d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecb91/ecb91d433dda0f078358c7ca346fb403823c094d" alt=""
Gileva and Malarko respond to the Gallery's call-out in very different ways: Gileva draws on her technical training in ceramics to produce fired and glazed ceramic motifs that symbolise her own public space ideals. Yet, while she challenges the boundaries of clay by testing the longevity of wet, pigmented and oil-infused slip, her installation remains highly ornamental – similar to that of a stately public fountain whose aesthetic is valued more than its functionally. Still, its strength lies in its portrayal of connectivity: her motifs are joined by the sea of blue slip, and the notion of 'meeting points' is implied through the placement of stepping stones.
Malarko's interpretation of city fountains and public space is much more playful. He is abrupt with his medium, casting pre-existing forms and incorporating mass-produced objects in order to communicate the value in ad-hoc public spaces. As with Gileva, Malarko's work is also ornamental – but while the Yukka plants and Mr Blobbys
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/972bc/972bc220d9ec00d13ce5904e7cc8a5148576f54f" alt=""